söndag 23 februari 2014

Paul Craig Roberts: - Den Amerikanska Stasi-Polisstaten stirrar oss rakt i ansiktet

2014-02-23. Paul Craig Roberts, som i många år arbetat inom de innersta kretsarna av USA:s etablissemang och regering, har skrivit en artikel om den amerikanska polisstaten av idag. Dagens Polisstat är naturligtvis redan uppenbar för alla moderna människor som har någon form av koncentrationsförmåga riktad mot viktiga saker, d.v.s. tyvärr bara ett litet fåtal... (engelsk text)

Amerikan Stasi Police State
Staring Us In The Face

Paul Craig Roberts
- Article posted Feb 19 2014

American taxpayers have built an entire city in Virginia so that the Pentagon, can practice occupying American cities and putting down protests by US citizens.

This fake city is the training ground for the doctrine outlined in a leaked US Army document that describes how soldiers are to be trained to put down domestic disturbances and process prisoners through detainment camps where prisoners will be re-educated to appreciate US policies. In situations of "extreme necessity" the training embraces deadly force: "Warning shot will not be fired.

When a firearm is discharged it will be fired with the intent of rendering the person(s) at whom it is discharged incapable of continuing that activity or course of behavior." Lecturers in the training courses describe constitutionalists as "domestic extremists."

Does this make the President of the United States, whose oath of office is to defend the US Constitution against enemies domestic and foreign, a domestic extremist? Is the fear of arrest by Homeland Security as a domestic extremist the reason Obama refuses to defend the Constitution of the United States?

The Army is being trained for domestic police duties that are in violation of the Posse Comitatus Act that prevents the use of the military for domestic law enforcement, another indication that Washington has no respect for the country's laws and that Obama and his "Justice" Department have no intention of enforcing the laws of the land or abiding by the Constitution. 

- Where is the media outcry? Where are the law schools? Where is Congress?

A government that disregards the laws of the land is both treasonous and tyrannical.

- Yet, not a peep from "the free and the brave."

The US government and its puppet auxiliary, the UK government, have turned with vengeance against whistleblowers and their attorneys. Bradley Manning is in prison, Julian Assange is confined to the Ecuadoran Embassy in London, and Edward Snowden is under Russian protection from a tyrannical US government. Jessellyn Radack, an attorney who represented Snowden was recently detained and questioned in an intimidating way at London's Heathrow Airport. Washington has taught its British puppet state how to mimic Washington's Gestapo ways.

The latest revelations of the criminal activities of the Amerikan National Stasi Agency

comes from a leaked NSA document that shows that the Stasi agency considers WikiLeaks Julian Assange to be a "malicious foreign actor" and launched "an international effort to focus the legal element of national power upon non-state actor Assange, and the human network that supports WikiLeaks." Clearly, the Gestapo is upon us.

RT reports: "The NSA was not alone in its sweeping espionage on the whistle-blowing organization. It also enlisted its partners in the Five Eyes spying network (UK, New Zealand, Australia and Canada) as well as other nations. In documents dating back from August 2010, the US urged 10 other countries with forces in Afghanistan to consider pressing criminal charges against Julian Assange — 'founder of the rogue WikiLeaks internet website and responsible for the unauthorized publication of over 70,000 classified documents covering the war in Afghanistan.'"

In other words, freedom of the press? We don't need no stinking freedom of the press. We have the presstitute press–the TV networks, the New York Times, Washington Post, National Public Radio, and all the rest of the officially sanctioned state Ministry of Propaganda.

Julian Assange stated, correctly, "The NSA and its UK accomplices show no respect for the rule of law."

WikiLeaks' attorney, Judge Baltasar Garzon, the pursuer of Pinochet, had this to say:

"The paradox is that Julian Assange and the WikiLeaks organization are being treated as a threat instead of what they are: a journalist and a media organization that are exercising their fundamental right to receive and impart information in its original form, free from omission and censorship, free from partisan interests, free from economic or political pressure."

What has happened that explains the transformation of the UK and all of its former English colonies–the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand–into Gestapo Stasi states? These are the countries best known historically for their domestic civil liberties and rule of law, irrespective of their treatment of their indigenous populations and in the case of England her non-white colonies.

The original dispossession was of indigenous peoples. Now these governments have turned on their own.Today the governments of the US, UK, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand (the Five Eyes) see civil liberty and the accountability of government to law as threats to themselves, and the governments are determined to stamp out the threats. The historical lands of liberty have abandoned liberty and become Stasi states.

What has occurred in the US and UK is that the criminal and treasonous acts of both governments have become so extreme that the governments must destroy civil liberty in order to protect themselves from exposure. Whenever you hear "national security" invoked, you know that government is covering up its crimes and its lies.

The criminal character of both US and UK governments is now recognized by the rest of the world, even by the bought-and-paid-for NATO puppet states, France and Germany. German Chancellor Angela Merkel and French President Francois Hollande are discussing the creation of an European communication network in order to protect Europeans' communications from the NSA and from Google, Facebook, and other US communication companies that shamelessly cooperate with NSA's spy network as junior members of the Stasi. Brazil and South America are facing the same challenge of protecting their communications from Washington's National Stasi Agency.

NSA spies on foreign companies for the benefit of American ones, and it spies on US law firms representing clients against the US government. The New York Times recently reported that the corrupt Australian puppet state has been working with NSA to steal the private communications of US lawyers with their clients in the Indonesian government involved in a trade dispute with Washington." In other words, NSA spying helps the US government to prevail in economic lawsuits against it, but the spying is justified in the name of the nonexistent "terrorist threat." The terrorist is NSA.

And you thought Washington was only spying on "terrorists" to prevent them from "killing us over here."

- It is impossible to paint a picture of a more lawless government than Washington has painted of itself.

It took a pop singer, Lorde, to declare in her Grammy Award acceptance speech last month that the emperor has no clothes: "Planet Earth is run by psychopaths that hide behind slick marketing, 'freedom' propaganda and 'economic growth' rhetoric, while they construct a global system of corporatized totalitarianism. As American journalist Chris Hedges has identified, a corporate totalitarian core thrives inside a fictitious democratic shell.

This core yields an 'inverted' totalitarian state that few recognize because it does not look like the Orwellian world of Nineteen Eighty-four.This corporate totalitarian core is spreading outward from America. Planet Earth is being rapidly militarized by the world's major and significant states, including their police forces. Meanwhile, state surveillance is becoming universal and torture is outsourced to gulags."

The TV channels censored her speech and cut it off by substituting pre-recorded content.

By cutting off Lorde's speech, the media moguls proved the truth of her words. Americans must not hear. The dolts might wake up.

Americans should take note that the media is on guard, prepared at an instance's notice to suppress free speech. Washington is ever so pleased to support protesters in Ukraine, who are witlessly helping Washington to subvert their country, but no protests at home thank you.

With the Pentagon building fake cities for soldiers to demolish while practicing the unconstitutional occupation practices that are in store for us in the homeland, Alex Jones' predictions move out of the realm of conspiracy theory.

Washington has finally noticed that the result of moving middle class jobs offshore is an American population without a future. As Gerald Celente says, when people have nothing left to lose, they lose it. The US military is gearing up for when Americans can't take it any more.

- Meanwhile Washington continues the pretense of America as the land of "freedom and democracy" and "concern for human rights," blah-blah-blah.

People all over the world, with the exception of the paid protesters in western Ukraine, are no longer listening to the bullshit flowing from Washington and its presstitute media. /

Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy and associate editor of the Wall Street Journal. He was columnist for Business Week, Scripps Howard News Service, and Creators Syndicate. He has had many university appointments. His internet columns have attracted a worldwide following. His latest book, The Failure of Laissez Faire Capitalism and Economic Dissolution of the West is now available. http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=46534
Vidareläsning 1:

Polisstat Extravaganza! - Välkommen till Psykopaternas Nya Världsordning (videos)

Här presenteras lite utvalda händelser på YouTube-videos från Polisstatens underbara värld 2013. - Tror du att du sett allt? ...Kanske, kanske inte, men kolla in de här filmerna först för att vara helt säker.

Vidareläsning 2:

Ett gratis smakprov på den Globala Polisstaten - "The Gray State"

En "prova på kampanj" från den globala polisstaten. Bloggen publicerar här några av polisstatens äventyr den senaste tiden. Vi publicerar även en trailer från "The Gray State" som är ett pågående filmprojekt i USA vilket startats för att visa hur både USA och flera andra västländer är på väg att bli militariserade polisstater...

Vidareläsning 3:

500 000 videos med kriminellt polisvåld mot civila på YouTube från USA - Sveriges förebild

Paul Craig, en ledande rådgivare till den tidigare Reaganadministrationen i USA, berättar om orsakerna till det kraftigt ökande polisvåldet mot civila i USA. Craigs analys gäller även för Sverige...

Paul Craig Roberts:
- Poliser ser frekvent allmänheten som fienden. 

- Mobbande busar och psykopater blir ofta poliser!

Vidareläsning 4:
Paul Craig Roberts: - Den Amerikanska Stasi-Polisstaten stirrar oss rakt i ansiktet

2 kommentarer:

  1. --Chicago PD Believes It Can See The Future, Starts Warning Citizens About Crimes They Might Commit--

    by Karl Bode 2014-02-27

    We've talked a lot over the years about the attempts to get out "ahead of crime" by using computer programs and algorithms to try and predict who might commit a crime. Predictive computing can then either target specific areas or specific people that might be in need of some extra law enforcement attention. Except as we've noted repeatedly, these programs are only as valuable as the data they use. Garbage in, garbage out, but in this case you've got a human being on the other end of the equation whose life can be dramatically impacted by law enforcement holding what they believe is "proof" that you'll soon be up to no good.

    With that in mind there's growing concerns about efforts in Chicago to use predictive analytical systems to generate a "heat list" -- or a list of 400 or so individuals most likely to be involved in violent crime. The Chicago efforts are based on a Yale sociologist's studies and use an algorithm created by an engineer at the Illinois Institute of Technology. People who find themselves on the list get personal visits from law enforcement warning them that they better be nice. The result is a collision between law enforcement that believes in the righteousness of these efforts and those who worry that they could, as an EFF rep states, create "an environment where police can show up at anyone's door at any time for any reason."

    Law enforcement and the code creators, as you'd expect, argue that it's only the bad guys that need to worry about a system like this:

    "A press liaison for the NIJ explains in an email: "These are persons who the model has determined are those most likely to be involved in a shooting or homicide, with probabilities that are hundreds of times that of an ordinary citizen." Commander Steven Caluris, who also works on the CPD's predictive policing program, put it a different way. "If you end up on that list, there's a reason you're there."

  2. -Supreme Court Gives Police More Leeway to Search Homes without a Warrant-

    All Gov - Thursday, February 27, 2014

    The U.S. Supreme Court has decided that law enforcement can search a person’s home even if they: (1) don’t have warrant, (2) if an occupant objects, and (3) the situation does not warrant an emergency.

    That’s the new legal standard established by the nation’s highest court in a case involving the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD).

    In 2009, officers showed up at the residence of Walter Fernandez, who was suspected of committing a robbery.

    The police did not have a court order to search Fernandez’s home. The suspect refused to grant officers permission to search the premises before they arrested him on the robbery charge.

    With Fernandez in custody, officers returned to his apartment a short while later and asked another occupant, Roxanne Rojas, who was living with the suspect, if they could enter and search the home.

    Rojas’ consent was sufficient enough for the LAPD to legally conduct its search, which turned up a shotgun and evidence of Fernandez involvement with gangs, according to the Supreme Court in a 6-3 ruling (pdf).

    Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. wrote for the majority that home searches are legal and do not violate the Fourth Amendment’s right against unreasonable searches as long as one occupant agrees, even if another does not.

    “A warrantless consent search is reasonable and thus consistent with the 4th Amendment irrespective of the availability of a warrant,” Alito wrote. “Even with modern technological advances, the warrant procedure imposes burdens on the officers who wish to search [and] the magistrate who must review the warrant application.”

    Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan disagreed with the court, saying the ruling weakens the requirement to obtain search warrants.

    “Instead of adhering to the warrant requirement, today’s decision tells the police they may dodge it,” Ginsburg said.

    “If a person’s health and safety are threatened by a domestic abuser, exigent circumstances would justify immediate removal of the abuser from the premises, as happened here,” she added.

    But, “the specter of domestic abuse hardly necessitates the diminution of the Fourth Amendment rights at stake here,” Ginsburg wrote.

    -Noel Brinkerhoff




Kommentera helst angående ämnet i artiklarna.
Juridiskt ansvar gentemot slavägarna (myndigheter) ligger helt hos kommentatorn. Uppenbara olagligheter inom hat och hets samt Bullshit & Trollshit plockas bort.