lördag 8 februari 2014

Edward Snowden - exklusiv och sensationell intervju 26:e januari 2014 " USA vill mörda mig"

2014-01-29-NDR.  - En ny lång och ingående intervju med Edward Snowden från den 26:e januari 2014. "Snowden berättar bl.a. att representanter för USA:s myndigheter meddelat att de t.ex. vill sätta en kula i huvudet på honom eller varför inte förgifta honom när han minst anar det..."
***


Snowden exklusiv - Das Interview - NDR (English) (January 26, 2014)

Whistleblower Edward Snowden leaked the documents about US mass surveillance. He spoke about his disclosures and his life to NDR investigative journalist Seipel in Moscow.
***
https://archive.org/details/snowden_interview_en
***
Vidareläsning:
***
Edward Snowden - exklusiv och sensationell intervju 26:e januari 2014 " USA vill mörda mig"

3 kommentarer:

  1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yates_v._United_States

    "Yates v. United States, 354 U.S. 298 (1957), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States that held that the First Amendment protected radical and reactionary speech, unless it posed a "clear and present danger."

    "In Talley v. California (1960),[78] the Court struck down a Los Angeles city ordinance that made it a crime to distribute anonymous pamphlets".
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Content-neutral_restrictions
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_speech_in_the_United_States

    " McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission (1995), the Court struck down an Ohio statute that made it a crime to distribute anonymous campaign literature.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_Agents_Registration_Act

    "Meese v. Keene (1987), the Court upheld the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938

    "The Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) is a United States law (22 U.S.C. § 611 et seq.) passed in 1938 requiring that agents representing the interests of foreign powers in a "political or quasi-political capacity" disclose their relationship with the foreign government and information about related activities and finances".

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_free_speech_exceptions
    " Exceptions to free speech in the United States are limitations on the First Amendment's guarantee of free speech and expression as recognized by the United States Supreme Court. These exceptions have been created over time, based on certain types of speech and expression, and under different contexts. While freedom of speech in the United States is a constitutional right, these exceptions make that right a limited one".
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_statements_of_fact
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fighting_words
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harper_%26_Row_v._Nation_Enterprises
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commercial_speech
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miller_v._California http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_obscenity_law
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_v._Ferber
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prior_restraint
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Censorship_in_the_United_States
    "Prior restraint (also referred to as prior censorship or pre-publication censorship) is censorship imposed, usually by a government, on expression before the expression actually takes Place
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_landmark_court_decisions_in_the_United_States#Landmark_decisions_in_First_Amendment_Rights

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Undercover_operation
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defamation http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_defamation_law "Defamation—also called calumny, vilification, or traducement—is the communication of a false statement that harms the reputation of an individual, business, product, group, government, religion, or nation. Most jurisdictions allow legal action to deter various kinds of defamation and retaliate against groundless criticism! slander, and defamation in other media such as printed words or images, called libe
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libel
    In US Constitutional law, False statements of fact are an exception from protection of free speech under the First Amendment http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defamation_and_the_First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defamation
    "truth is not a defense for invasion of privacy."

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Privacy_laws_of_the_United_States
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_light
    "False light laws"

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_speech_zone

    "State Dept. Contractor to Go to Jail Under Espionage Act for Tipping off Journalist" http://www.bobtuskin.com/2014/02/08/state-dept-contractor-to-go-to-jail-under-espionage-act-for-tipping-off-journalist/ -

    SvaraRadera
  2. Totalövervakning av webben???

    Lita på att det kommer bli värre när de kör Robban Rövbergs trolljägarna i vår där de kommer ha gråtande tonårsfröknar som blivit utsatta för näthat.

    Sen kommer politiker att ställas till svar över hur de kan tillåta Vilda Webben !

    Politikerna kommer säga " det är svårt bla bla "yttrandefriheten ".... sen kommer ni få se på näthatslagar.

    SvaraRadera
  3. --Media Blacks Out New Snowden Interview The Government Doesn’t Want You to See--

    Jan 31, 2014 - Ben Swann

    This past Sunday evening former NSA contractor Edward Snowden sat down for an interview with German television network ARD. The interview has been intentionally blocked from the US public, with virtually no major broadcast news outlets covering this story.

    *****In addition, the video has been taken down almost immediately every time it’s posted on YouTube.*****

    In contrast, this was treated as a major political event in both print and broadcast media, in Germany, and across much of the world. In the interview, Mr. Snowden lays out a succinct case as to how these domestic surveillance programs undermine and erode human rights and democratic freedom.

    He states that his “breaking point” was “seeing Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper, directly lie under oath to Congress” denying the existence of a domestic spying programs while under questioning in March of last year. Mr. Snowden goes on to state that,
    “The public had a right to know about these programs.

    The public had a right to know that which the government is doing in its name, and that which the government is doing against the public.”

    **It seems clear that the virtual blackout of this insightful interview is yet another deliberate attempt to obfuscate the truth from the view of the American public.**

    ***The media has continually attempted to shill the official government lies about mass domestic surveillance programs, justifying them as necessary to fight the “War on Terror”, while attempting to painting Mr. Snowden as a traitor.***

    [...]

    http://benswann.com/media-blacks-out-new-snowden-interview-the-government-doesnt-want-you-to-see/

    SvaraRadera

KOMMENTARER

Kommentera helst angående ämnet i artiklarna.
Juridiskt ansvar gentemot slavägarna (myndigheter) ligger helt hos kommentatorn. Uppenbara olagligheter inom hat och hets samt Bullshit & Trollshit plockas bort.