The people of Sweden should not allow their government to continue to disgrace itself in another international governmental crime - this one a pernicious attack on freedom of expression - simply because Washington wants them to do so. /*
1,410,741 people like Al Jazeera English.
*
Internationella reaktioner på Stefan Lindskogs föreläsning i Australien, den 3:e april 2013
*
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AlJazeera 2013-04-04: "Even in the past, Sweden had "collaborated with its Washington allies" to violate human rights and international law."
[...]The Swedish government also refused to negotiate with Ecuador for an extradition under which Assange would go to Sweden but not be subject to extradition to the US.
This would be very easy for Sweden (or the UK, for that matter) to arrange. Once again, the Swedish government offered no reason for its refusal to consider this obvious solution to the diplomatic impasse.
Contrary to much press commentary, there is no need for conspiracy theories here to draw the logical conclusion. If the Swedish government really wanted to pursue the investigation of sexual offence allegations against Assange, they could do so.
But instead, they are deliberately abandoning the criminal investigation - which is getting older and more difficult to pursue - for other reasons.[...]
Mark Weisbrot is co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research, Washington, DC. He is also President of Just Foreign Policy.
*
http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2012/09/20129674125619411.html
Artikel 2013-04-04
Top Swedish judge defends Wikileaks' Assange |
*
|
Inga kommentarer:
Skicka en kommentar
KOMMENTARER
Kommentera helst angående ämnet i artiklarna.
Juridiskt ansvar gentemot slavägarna (myndigheter) ligger helt hos kommentatorn. Uppenbara olagligheter inom hat och hets samt Bullshit & Trollshit plockas bort.