BBC avslöjades sprida propaganda för attack mot Syrien

100-tals döda från Irak

hamnade plötsligt i Syrien...

2012-05-28 Info Wars
Engelska BBC skrev den 27 maj 2012 följande på "News Middle Est":
- Nationerna här i väst kräver en snar respons på massakern i den Syriska staden Houla. USA kräver också ett omedelbart slut på det man kallar - President Bashar al-Assads styre genom mord.


För att visa allvaret i det hela publicerade BBC en bild på döda (underförstått mest barn) från massakern i Houla uppradade i vita säckar på ett betonggolv i en skola, samtidigt som en liten pojke som hoppar över liken...

Problemet var bara att kropparna kom från en Irakisk massgrav som hittats 9 år tidigare och liken på bilden hade transporterats till en skola i Irak för att identifieras...

Fotografen som tog bilden redan 2003 hörde av sig och klagade över att BBC använde hans 9 år gamla bild som propaganda mot den Syriska regimen.

Den som följer med bloggen blev kanske en aning förvånad över gårdagens publicering av en gammal historia från 1990:

Hill & Knowlton – PR-firman som startade Gulfkriget.

*Läs gärna den artikeln och se hur utstuderat media och krigsindustrin manipulerade opinionen då.
- Media och krigsindustrin har inte blivit bättre med tiden... :(

Här är en länk till en video som enligt uppgift visar de döda barnen i Houla på riktigt.
*Video footage of the child victims. (*Varning för mycket starka bilder.)

- Det finns många frågetecken om vem som i verkligheten utförde det fruktansvärda dådet.

Om det verkligen skulle vara Syriens regim som sanktionerar sånt här så blir nästa fråga givetvis; - Varför de gör det just nu när de har hela världens ögon riktade mot sig?

Om Syriens regim vill att NATO skall anfalla och jämna även detta land med marken, så är det ju just så här de skall agera... Lista ut resten själv...

- Läs även artikeln på engelska undertill där de går noggrannare in på detta...

*Läs hela artikeln på engelska från Info Wars här:

BBC Caught In Syria Massacre Propaganda Hoax

News agency uses picture of dead Iraqi children to depict alleged government atrocity

Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
Monday, May 28, 2012
The British media has been caught yet again with its pants down in the effort to sell a NATO-led attack on Syria, with the revelation that BBC News used a years-old photo of dead Iraqi children to depict victims of an alleged government assault on the town of Houla.

In a report issued hours after the massacre, the BBC used a photo that was first published over nine years ago and taken in Al Mussayyib, Iraq. The image shows a child skipping over the dead bodies of hundreds of Iraqi children who have been transported from a mass grave to be identified.

The caption used by the BBC to describe the image stated that the picture was provided by an activist and “believed to show the bodies of children in Houla awaiting burial”. After the “mistake” was exposed, the BBC changed their original article but did not issue a retraction.

The photographer who took the original picture, Marco Di Lauro, posted on his Facebook page, “Somebody is using my images as a propaganda against the Syrian government to prove the massacre.” Di Lauro told the London Telegraph he was “astonished” the BBC had failed to check to authenticity of the image.

“What I am really astonished by is that a news organization like the BBC doesn’t check the sources and it’s willing to publish any picture sent it by anyone: activist, citizen journalist or whatever. That’s all,” said Di Lauro.

Information surrounding the massacre at Houla clearly suggests that the murders were carried out by death squads and not shelling by government tanks. Video footage of the child victims (warning – graphic) appears to show gunshot wounds to the face and stab wounds. None of the victims appear to have lost any limbs.

As RT reports, “Many of the victims were executed at point blank-range,” a fact inconsistent with the explanation that tank shelling was responsible for the bloodshed. It’s equally as likely that terrorist death squads, responsible for numerous deadly bombings in Syria that have killed scores of people, were responsible for the massacre.

As Tony Cartalucci writes, “Why on earth would the Syrian Government want to kill Syrian children? And even if for some reason they did – why would they do so in a way more or less guaranteed to attract international condemnation and renewed calls for intervention? In other words, ‘cui bono‘?

“Who really benefits from this atrocity – and who doesn’t? Surely the insurgents and their foreign backers benefit. and the Syrian Government most certainly does not! Given that recent bomb atrocities in Damascus have been blamed – almost universally – on extremist opponents of the Assad Government, isn’t it at least plausible they’re also behind this latest horror?”

Whatever the truth behind events over the weekend, the mass media has once again prostrated itself as a rolling propaganda mouthpiece for the claims of dubious anonymous “activists” who have proven to be adept at staging propaganda time and time again.

This is by no means the first time the British media has salaciously claimed that Assad’s forces are indiscriminately killing babies and children.

Back in February, the London Independent reported, “President Assad’s security forces have indiscriminately killed scores of newborn babies in Homs this week.”

As we documented, the source for this claim did not originate in Syria but in London, from an organization called Syrian Observatory for Human Rights (SOHR), which is little more than a lobbying group with intimate ties to the UK Foreign Office.

The propaganda tool of falsely accusing governments of killing babies and children is not new to the middle east. Before the first Gulf War, then largest public relations firm in the world Hill & Knowlton crafted a hoax centered around the lie that Saddam Hussein’s troops were ransacking hospitals in Kuwait and throwing babies out of incubators.

Despite later being proven to be a complete fabrication, George H.W. Bush administration aggressively pushed the story as part of their build-up to war.

http://www.infowars.com/bbc-caught-in-syria-massacre-propaganda-hoax/

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hill & Knowlton & Nayirha fixar Gulfkriget

HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS IN KUWAIT, Oct. 10, 1990

The Congressional Human Rights Caucus conducted a hearing to investigate alleged Iraqi human rights violations in occupied Kuwait.

Cases of rape, execution, imprisonment and the destruction of hospitals in Kuwait were heard by the committee.

Nayirah al-Ṣabaḥ (Arabic: نيره الصباح‎), called "Nurse Nayirah" in the media, was a fifteen-year-old Kuwaiti girl, who alleged that she had witnessed the murder of infant children by Iraqi soldiers in Kuwait, in verbal testimony to the U.S. Congress, in the run up to the 1991 Gulf War.

Her testimony, which was regarded as credible at the time, has since come to be regarded as wartime propaganda. The public relations firm Hill & Knowlton, which was in the employ of Citizens for a Free Kuwait, had arranged the testimony. Nayirah's testimony was widely publicized.

Hill & Knowlton, which had filmed the hearing, sent out a video news release to Medialink, a firm which served about 700 television stations in the United States. That night, portions of the testimony aired on ABC's Nightline and NBC Nightly News reaching an estimated audience between 35 and 53 million Americans.

Seven senators cited Nayirah's testimony in their speeches backing the use of force. President George Bush repeated the story at least ten times in the following weeks.
(Wikipedia)


Her father was the Kuwaiti ambassador to the USA; he is sitting right next to her during the hearing but he pretends not to know her.

undermattan.blogg

Publicerat som Information. Texter och bilder tillhör sina respektive upphovsmän
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------