fredag 30 augusti 2013

Ron Paul: Kemvapenattacken i Syrien - en "False Flag" av USA och al-Qaida

Ron Paul: - Jag tror kemvapenattacken var en "false flag". Varför reagerar ingen på att USA krigar tillsammans med al-Qaida just nu? (video)

Publicerad den 29 aug 2013
Former Rep. Ron Paul, (R-Texas), argues the U.S. should stay out of Syria.

Ron Paul: Syria Chemical Attack A ‘False Flag’

Mikael Thalen
August 30, 2013

During an interview on Fox Business’ Cavuto Wednesday, former Texas Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas) commented on the unfolding situation in Syria, specifically calling the recent chemical attack a ‘false flag’ likely carried out by the US backed Al Qaeda filled rebels.

I think it’s a false flag…” said Paul. “Why don’t we ask about the Al Qaeda? Why are we on the side of the Al Qaeda right now?”
Despite the Obama administration’s attempt to immediately blame Assad’s forces for the chemical attack, multiple U.S. officials have said that the administration’s evidence is “not a slam dunk.” Officials also mentioned that the administration had no “smoking gun.” In fact, the rebels have now even claimed responsibility for the attacks, and Anthony Gucciardi has revealed that mounting evidence lends to the reality that the Syrian rebels carried out the attacks.

Even with Syrian Deputy Foreign Fayssal Mekdad presenting evidence to the UN that strongly points to a rebel led chemical attack, the Obama administration has continued to ignore any evidence that can’t be used to justify military action against Assad, including multiple YouTube videos showing rebels launching chemical weapons on civilian targets.

Paul also exposed the history of lies and propaganda used by the US government to justify military intervention, pointing specifically to the Iraq war.
“Look at how many lies were told to us about Saddam Hussein prior to that buildup, war propaganda. It’s endless, it happens all the time,” said Paul, also pointing to Donald Rumsfeld’s role in supplying chemical weapons to Saddam in the 1980′s.

Mounting evidence forced out by the alternative media has destroyed the government’s credibility, with now only 9 percent of Americans supporting military intervention in Syria. The international backlash also caused UK Prime Minister David Cameron to momentarily back down after the British parliament voted against authorizing military action. Cameron later decided to send military jets to Cyprus, claiming the move was purely “defensive.”

Last April during a speech in Austin, Texas, Paul warned of the system’s increasing war propaganda and predicted that a false flag incident would likely accelerate the US deeper into the Middle Eastern conflict.

Editor’s note: This latest declaration by Paul is a perfect example of how we are winning the fight against the globalist attempts to launch World War 3 through a hot war with Syria that is ultimately failing and blowing up in the face of the establishment thanks to the alternative media and voices like Paul’s. And whether or not the Obama administration is crazy enough to go into a hot war with Syria, the people are now fully aware of what’s happening. 

- De slet ut barnen från kuvöserna, tog med sig kuvöserna och lämnade spädbarnen på golvet för att dö”.
(…en klassiker, Reds Anm.)

[...] Hill & Knowlton tillverkade en liten videofilm om denna tillverkade historia och sände ut den över hela världens massmedia. Den sändes på NBCs kvällsnyheter och miljoner människor såg den. Denna video visades i FNs säkerhetsråd vid en presentation den 27 november 1990. Förutom Nayirah- vittnade sju andra tillverkade vittnen av vilka fem var tillverkade av Hill & Knowlton. De använde sig av falska namn utan att avslöja det.
 Vem var Nayirah – ja, hon var helt enkelt dotter till Kuwaits ambassadör i USA och hade övertalats av Lauri Fitz-Pegado att avge detta vittnesmål som även Kuwaits egna forskare senare bekräftade var falska.[...]

Ron Paul: Kemvapenattacken i Syrien - en "False Flag" av USA och al-Qaida



3 kommentarer:

  1. -Syrians In Ghouta Claim Saudi-Supplied Rebels Behind Chemical Attack-

    August 30, 2013

    Source Mint Press

    As the machinery for a U.S.-led military intervention in Syria gathers pace following last week’s chemical weapons attack, the U.S. and its allies may be targeting the wrong culprit.

    Interviews with people in Damascus and Ghouta, a suburb of the Syrian capital, where the humanitarian agency Doctors Without Borders said at least 355 people had died last week from what it believed to be a neurotoxic agent, appear to indicate as much.

    The U.S., Britain, and France as well as the Arab League have accused the regime of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad for carrying out the chemical weapons attack, which mainly targeted civilians. U.S. warships are stationed in the Mediterranean Sea to launch military strikes against Syria in punishment for carrying out a massive chemical weapons attack.

    The U.S. and others are not interested in examining any contrary evidence, with U.S Secretary of State John Kerry sayingMonday that Assad’s guilt was “a judgment … already clear to the world.”

    However, from numerous interviews with doctors, Ghouta residents, rebel fighters and their families, a different picture emerges. Many believe that certain rebels received chemical weapons via the Saudi intelligence chief, Prince Bandar bin Sultan, and were responsible for carrying out the dealing gas attack.


  2. -US-Israeli False Flag Gas Attack Unravels-

    August 30, 2013

    By William Bowles, Information Clearing House

    This is where it all started: The Israeli intelligence front the Debkafile, which is the source of the story that implicated the Assad government and/or its military in the gas attack on East Ghouta and now forms the basis for the war on Syria.

    DEBKAfile’s military sources affirm that, just as the Assad brothers orchestrated the chemical shell attack on Syrian civilians, so too did Hizballah’s leader Hassan Nasrallah set in motion the rocket attack on Israel.

    – ‘The sarin shells fired on Damascus – by Syrian 4th Division’s 155th Brigade – were followed by rockets on Israel and car bombings in Lebanon‘, Debkafile, 24 August 2013

    Let’s try sum up what we do know:

    On the 21 August from a suburb of Damascus, Douma (or Duma) then under ‘rebel’ control, two missiles were fired at another ‘rebel’ controlled suburb of Damascus called East Ghouta, killing an unknown number of people, including children.

    It is assumed now that some kind of nerve gas or at least poison gas was used. The New York Times have documented this here, although they’ve moved some of the locations on the map.

    In this regard how does the NYT reconcile their take on the source of the missiles with the Mossad version, which makes them artillery shells fired from the mountains in the South ( see the Mossad version below, such as it is). This is confirmed by Pepe Escobar’s report of Russian satellite evidence.

    Within hours, or even minutes, videos of the alleged effects of the attack were circulating on the Web and without a pause for a breath (let alone any evidence), led by the UK and followed closely by France, they were blaming the Assad government for the attack and pressing for an immediate attack on Syria, with or without authorisation from the UN Security Council.

    For more on this see this Wiki, where details on the launch of the two missiles can be found. It’s not exactly a coherent presentation as it’s an assemblage of links and descriptions, but it looks like the missiles were launched from a Syrian Special Forces base in Douma (or Duma) then occupied by the ‘rebels’.

    The ‘Evidence’[...]

  3. -US intel assessment based on ‘terrorist lies’ and ‘media hype’ – Syrian Foreign Ministry-

    August 30

    The intelligence assessment the US administration presented as evidence that the Syrian government deployed chemical weapons on its own people is baseless and based on “terrorist lies” and “media exaggeration,” Syrian foreign ministry sources say.

    A source at the Foreign and Expatriates Ministry told Sana, Syria’s state-owned news agency, that any American military action in Syria would only serve the political interests of the United States, despite pledges from US lawmakers that the action is meant to curb the use of chemical weapons against civilians.

    “The Syrian government affirms that Kerry’s allegations that the Syrian Army knew about chemical weapons use three days prior to the incident are lies,” the source told Sana, “as proven by the fact that Syria requested the investigation committee to visit al-Bahaia area where Syrian Army soldiers were exposed to toxic gas, and the committee met the affected soldiers in the area.”

    In the extracts of the classified US report released Friday, the American intelligence community to have been aware of an impending chemical weapon attack three days before the August 21 crisis. A White House spokesman, speaking with reporters Friday, refused to discuss whether that information had been shared with anyone including the Syrian opposition.[...]



Kommentera helst angående ämnet i artiklarna.
Juridiskt ansvar gentemot slavägarna (myndigheter) ligger helt hos kommentatorn. Uppenbara olagligheter inom hat och hets samt Bullshit & Trollshit plockas bort.