Mainstreammedia förlöjligar och trakasserar frekvent personer som ifrågasätter medias ofta falska och förbeställda agenda-nyheter. De verkliga näthatarna finns bland mainstreams bidragsfinansierade journalister. CIA skapade en gång i tiden makt-ordet "konspirationsteoretiker" för att misskreditera människor i media som avslöjade deras lönnmord och kriminella operationer...
När kommunist eller förrädare inte fungerar är "konspirationsteoretiker" alltid ett alternativ... Forskningsstudier bland psykologer visar nu att det istället är den psykologiska profilen för myndighetsivrare som ofta sammanfaller med fanatism och galenskap...
***
2013-07-12. - En ny undersökning där välmeriterade psykologer jämfört s.k. konspirationsteoretiker med okritiska myndighetslojala ja-sägare, har visat på verkligt skrämmande resultat tvärt emot tidigare myndighetssanktionerade åsikter... 
Myndigheternas lojala försvarare av den enda sanningen visade sig vara både mer fanatiskt fientliga och psykiskt obalanserade än de s.k konspirationsteoretikerna. Detta har lett psykologerna till slutsatsen att numera är ofta myndighetsanhängare fanatiska galningar och konspirationsteoretiker de mentalt normala.Psykologerna kom också fram till att de som använder beteckningen "konspirationsteoretiker" om sin motståndare i en diskussion, oftast gör det för att förolämpa motståndaren p.g.a. sin egen mentala och faktamässiga otillräcklighet.
Termen "konspirationsteoretiker" lanserades en gång i tiden av CIA och den negativa förlöjligande betydelsen av ordet tvättades noggrant in i allmänhetens medvetande av mainstreammedia för att enkelt kunna misskreditera personer som ifrågasatte CIA:s och medias verksamhet.
Ett lägligt s.k. makt-ord att ta till när inte kommunist, terrorist eller opatriotisk fungerar...
Psykologerna bakom undersökningen poängterar nu också att ett förvånande stort antal s.k. konspirationer vid senare tillfällen regelbundet visat sig vara alldeles sanna.
Det enda som UM-bloggen kan tillägga här är att Edward Snowden fullständigt sabbade bloggens konspirationsstämpel när det gäller övervakning. - Fu*k you Edward!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2013-07-12 Blacklisted News
The most recent study was published on July 8th by psychologists Michael J. Wood and Karen M. Douglas of the University of Kent (UK). Entitled “What about Building 7? A social psychological study of online discussion of 9/11 conspiracy theories,” the study compared “conspiracist” (pro-conspiracy theory) and “conventionalist” (anti-conspiracy) comments at news websites.
The authors were surprised to discover that it is now more conventional to leave so-called conspiracist comments than conventionalist ones: “Of the 2174 comments collected, 1459 were coded as conspiracist and 715 as conventionalist.” In other words, among people who comment on news articles, those who disbelieve government accounts of such events as 9/11 and the JFK assassination outnumber believers by more than two to one.
That means it is the pro-conspiracy commenters who are expressing what is now the conventional wisdom, while the anti-conspiracy commenters are becoming a small, beleaguered minority.
Perhaps because their supposedly mainstream views no longer represent the majority, the anti-conspiracy commenters often displayed anger and hostility: “The research… showed that people who favoured the official account of 9/11 were generally more hostile when trying to persuade their rivals.”
Additionally, it turned out that the anti-conspiracy people were not only hostile, but fanatically attached to their own conspiracy theories as well. According to them, their own theory of 9/11 - a conspiracy theory holding that 19 Arabs, none of whom could fly planes with any proficiency, pulled off the crime of the century under the direction of a guy on dialysis in a cave in Afghanistan - was indisputably true. The so-called conspiracists, on the other hand, did not pretend to have a theory that completely explained the events of 9/11: “For people who think 9/11 was a government conspiracy, the focus is not on promoting a specific rival theory, but in trying to debunk the official account.”
- In short, the new study by Wood and Douglas suggests that the negative stereotype of the conspiracy theorist - a hostile fanatic wedded to the truth of his own fringe theory - accurately describes the people who defend the official account of 9/11, not those who dispute it.
Additionally, the study found that so-called conspiracists discuss historical context (such as viewing the JFK assassination as a precedent for 9/11) more than anti-conspiracists. It also found that the so-called conspiracists to not like to be called “conspiracists” or “conspiracy theorists.”[...]
http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/07/12/313399/conspiracy-theorists-vs-govt-dupes/
http://www.phantomreport.com/new-studies-conspiracy-theorists-sane-government-dupes-crazy-hostile
http://www.blacklistednews.com/New_studies%3A_%E2%80%98Conspiracy_theorists%E2%80%99_sane%3B_government_dupes_crazy%2C_hostile/27293/0/38/38/Y/M.html
***
***
Ny forskning visar: Konspirationsteoretiker är normala och myndighetsivrare tokiga fanatiker
-CIA Confirms Role in 1953 Iran Coup-
SvaraRaderaPosted – August 19, 2013
Documents Provide New Details on Mosaddeq Overthrow and Its Aftermath
National Security Archive Calls for Release of Remaining Classified Record
National Security Archive Electronic Briefing Book No. 435
Washington, D.C., August 19, 2013 – Marking the sixtieth anniversary of the overthrow of Iranian Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddeq, the National Security Archive is today posting recently declassified CIA documents on the United States' role in the controversial operation.
American and British involvement in Mosaddeq's ouster has long been public knowledge, but today's posting includes what is believed to be the CIA's first formal acknowledgement that the agency helped to plan and execute the coup. [...]
http://www2.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB435/
-Diana death driver’s family delighted at police probe into claims she was murdered by a British soldier-
SvaraRaderaAugust 19, 2013
Source: UK Daily Mail
An investigation into a claim the SAS was involved in the death of Princess Diana has been welcomed by the family of Henri Paul, her driver on the night she died.
Scotland Yard has confirmed that officers from its specialist crime and operations command are assessing information handed to it ‘recently’ by the Royal Military Police.
The extraordinary allegation emerged during the second court martial of Sergeant Danny Nightingale, who was found guilty of illegally possessing a gun and ammunition.
It was outlined in a letter seen by the Daily Mail and written by the mother-in-law of an SAS sniper, known only as Soldier N, who was a key witness for the prosecution.
The eight-page correspondence claims Soldier N boasted it was the SAS that had ‘arranged Princess Diana’s death’ and that it had been ‘covered up’.[...]
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2396791/Princess-Diana-death-driver-Henri-Pauls-family-delighted-police-probe-murder-British-soldier-claims.html
http://www.blacklistednews.com/Diana_death_driver%E2%80%99s_family_delighted_at_police_probe_into_claims_she_was_murdered_by_a_British_soldier/28216/0/38/38/Y/M.html