lördag 15 mars 2014

Ron Paul Institute: Obamas nya exekutiva order - staten kan beslagta fredsaktivisters egendom

Enligt "Ron Paul Institute" så innebär Obamas senaste exekutiva order att amerikanska staten kan beslagta fredsaktivisters egendom. Detta gäller om de motsätter sig USA:s agenda i Ukraina, även om den kan innebära ett fullskaligt krig mot Ryssland...
***
--------------------------------
Exekutiv order är i amerikansk politik en sorts dekret som på federal nivå utfärdas av presidenten. Dessa order ges normalt av presidenten till företrädare för verkställande (exekutiv) makt inom regeringen, och inte till medborgare. Artikel 1, sektion 1, av den amerikanska konstitutionen ger specifikt all lagstiftande makt till Kongressen, inte presidenten. Amerikanska presidenter har utfärdat executive order sedan 1789. Exekutiva order kan i USA också utfärdas på delstatsnivå genom delstatens guvernör och på kommunnivå genom stadens borgmästare. Begreppet som sådant skapades 1907, men amerikanska presidenter har tagit beslut ända sedan 1789 som i praktiken är (eller var) exekutiva order.
***
http://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exekutiv_order
----------------------------------
***

Against Ukraine War? Obama May Seize Your Assets

***
Ron Paul Institute - Friday March 14, 2014
Do you, like 56 percent of the US population,
believe that the US should "not get too involved" in the Ukraine situation? Do you think that the US administration putting us on a war footing with Russia is a bad idea?

Are you concerned that the new, US-backed leaders of Ukraine -- not being elected -- might lack democratic legitimacy? Are you tempted to speak out against US policy in Ukraine; are you tempted to criticize the new Ukrainian regime?

Be careful what you say. Be careful what you write. President Obama has just given himself the authority to seize your assets.

According to the president's recent Executive Order, "Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Situation in Ukraine" (first reported by WND's Aaron Klein), the provisions for seizure of property extend to "any United States person." 

That means "any United States citizen, permanent resident alien, entity organized under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States (including foreign branches), or any person in the United States."

Declaring a "national emergency" over the planned referendum in Crimea to determine whether or not to join Russia, the US president asserts that asset seizure is possible for any US person "determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State":

(i) to be responsible for or complicit in, or to have engaged in, directly or indirectly, any of the following: 
(A) actions or policies that undermine democratic processes or institutions in Ukraine;

(B) actions or policies that threaten the peace, security, stability, sovereignty, or territorial integrity of Ukraine; or

(C) misappropriation of state assets of Ukraine or of an economically significant entity in Ukraine;
The Executive Order is, as usual, so broadly written that it leaves nearly everything open to interpretation.[...]

http://ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/featured-articles/2014/march/14/against-ukraine-war-obama-may-seize-your-assets.aspx

[...] For example, what are “direct or indirect…actions or policies that threaten the peace, security, stability, sovereignty, or territorial integrity of Ukraine”? Could that be someone writing an article that takes issue with the US policy that the Crimea referendum is illegal and illegitimate? 

Could it be standing up in a public meeting and expressing the view that Ukraine would be better off with nationwide referenda to determine whether other regions should become autonomous or joined to neighboring countries? What if a Polish-American appears on a radio or television program suggesting that parts of Poland incorporated into Ukraine after WWII should be returned to Polish authority?

Probably the president will not seize the assets of Americans in the scenarios above. But he says he can.
As the US government moves ever-closer to war with Russia, it is reasonable to expect these attempts to squash dissent and to remove “threats” to the administration’s position. The historical pattern is clear.

Recall Eugene V. Debs sentenced to ten years in prison for his opposition to US involvement in WWI. Recall Japanese-Americans interned in camps during WWII because their loyalty to the United States was deemed suspect.

The stage is being set to silence dissent. It sounds alarmist to read this, agreed.
Probably the president will not use his Executive Order to seize the assets of Americans who disagree with his Ukraine policy. But he says he can.

Careful what you say.
 
http://www.infowars.com/against-ukraine-war-obama-may-seize-your-assets/

***

Against Ukraine War? Obama May Seize Your Assets

***

Ron Paul Institute: Obamas nya exekutiva order - staten kan beslagta fredsaktivisters egendom

11 kommentarer:

  1. Härmed redan Tyska TV skojar om Ukrainska Hunta (s.k. "revolutionärer) och USA sponsörer:
    Tyskar utskrattar grymt Maidan, Klichko, McCaine, Kerry och EU politiker i satiriska programm 11.03.2014 "Die Anstalt" ("Mentalsjukhus"): !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iej-kuaN1Mg

    SvaraRadera
    Svar
    1. :) Jo man förstår väl ungefär vad de försöker säga om revolutionen (trots viss begränsad kunskap i Tyska språket...)
      Ska kolla efter en video med engelsk text...

      Radera
  2. "Die Anstalt"

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R-16AZmdtW0&feature=youtu.be

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gC2Bxdqlm-E

    SvaraRadera
  3. Han är bortom alla röda linjer som skiljer det förnuftiga, goda och mänskliga / det onda, neurotiska och psykopatiska.

    SvaraRadera
    Svar
    1. ...Kanske en värdig representant för den "nya gränslösa världsordningen"?

      Radera
  4. Härmed for info analys av Israeliska säkerhets tjänsten om situationen i Ukraina och USA vice verser Ryssland (från Israeliska underrättelse tjänsten Nativ-Jakov Kedmi, dialog på ryska men är värd att översätta):

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lShxKVxSSOc

    SvaraRadera
  5. --About 95% of Crimeans in referendum voted to join Russia - preliminary results--

    March 16, 2014

    Around 95 percent of voters in the Crimean referendum have answered ‘yes’ to the autonomous republic joining Russia and less than 5 percent of the vote participants want the region to remain part of Ukraine, according to preliminary results.

    With around 50 percent of the votes already counted, preliminary result show that 95.5 percent of voters said 'yes' to the reunion of the republic with Russia as a constituent unit of the Russian Federation. In Sevastopol, the number of those who voted ‘yes’ stands at 93 percent, according to the head of the Sevastopol commission, Valery Medvedev.

    The preliminary results of the popular vote were announced during a meeting in the center of Sevastopol, the city that hosts Russia's Black Sea fleet.

    The overall voter turnout in the referendum on the status of Crimea is 81,37%, according to the head of the Crimean parliament’s commission on the referendum, Mikhail Malyshev.

    Over a half of the Tatars living in the port city took part in the referendum, with the majority of them voting in favor of joining Russia, reports Itar-Tass citing a representative of the Tatar community Lenur Usmanov.

    About 40% of Crimean Tatars went to polling stations on Sunday, the republic’s prime minister Sergey Aksyonov said.

    In Simferopol, the capital of the republic, at least 15,000 have gathered to celebrate the referendum in central Lenin square and people reportedly keep arriving. Demonstrators, waving
    Russian and Crimean flags, are watching a live concert and awaiting the announcement of preliminary results of the voting.

    **International observers are planning to present their final declaration on the Crimean referendum on March 17, the head of the monitors’ commission, Polish MP Mateush Piskorski told journalists. He added that the voting was held in line with international norms and standards.

    Next week, Crimea will officially introduce the ruble as a second official currency along with Ukrainian hryvna, Aksyonov told Interfax. In his words, the dual currency will be in place for about six months.

    Overall, the republic’s integration into Russia will take up to a year, the Prime Minister said, adding that it could be done faster. However, they want to maintain relations with “economic entities, including Ukraine,” rather than burn bridges.

    Moscow is closely monitoring the vote count in Crimea, said Russia’s Deputy Foreign Minister Georgy Karasin. [...]

    http://rt.com/news/crimea-vote-join-russia-210/

    SvaraRadera
  6. OBS!
    Situationen i Ukraina under Hunta blir i snart framtid fara för Norden och Europa - ekonomisk situation skall bli bara sämre med varje dag. Kriminella grupperingar och nu Hunta frisläpper alla kriminella mördare från alla fängelser då de vill utnyttja de mot sina motståndare - situationen blir rena rama bandit stat och dessutom alla vapen arsenaler är rånade på allt- tung beväpnade kriminella hungriga banditer skall gjorda korta rånar anfall mot alla EU länder- i sådant situation fixa falska dokument är ingen problem och inte ens det behöves då i Ukraina i verkligheten råder total anarki redan med mord, rån alla omänskliga mord kidnappning av människor i full gång - med detta mentalitet förberedd er till ökad rån, mord etc ÖVERALLT!!!!

    SvaraRadera
  7. Tyska medier redan börjar prata och visa sanning om det som händer:

    Terrorist Activities of peaceful Demonstrators !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    07.03.2014

    http://www.klagemauer.tv/?a=showportal&keyword=englisch&id=2445

    SvaraRadera
  8. På tyska:

    Terroristische Aktionen friedlicher Demonstranten

    http://www.klagemauer.tv/?a=showportal&keyword=bildung&id=2389

    SvaraRadera
  9. -New Executive Order: “Obama Has Just Given Himself the Authority to Seize Your Assets”-

    March 20, 2014

    Mac Slavo Writes:

    The new Executive Order doesn’t just apply to just Russians or foreigners. It gets blanket coverage, so even American citizens could now face asset forfeiture if their actions are deemed to be “contributing to the situation in the Ukraine.”

    Be careful what you say. Be careful what you write. President Obama has just given himself the authority to seize your assets.

    According to the president’s recent Executive Order, “Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Situation in Ukraine” (first reported by WND’s Aaron Klein), the provisions for seizure of property extend to “any United States person.”

    That means “any United States citizen, permanent resident alien, entity organized under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States (including foreign branches), or any person in the United States.”

    Via: The Ron Paul Institute
    http://ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/featured-articles/2014/march/14/against-ukraine-war-obama-may-seize-your-assets.aspx

    Like most Executive Orders and government legalese, the definitions for why an individual would have their assets seized under this directive are extremely broad and they could, for all intents and purposes, be used against anyone who supports Russian interests, or simply argues against those of the United States.

    You can read the full Executive Order at the White House web site.[...]

    http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2014/03/06/executive-order-blocking-property-certain-persons-contributing-situation

    http://www.shtfplan.com/headline-news/new-executive-order-obama-has-just-given-himself-the-authority-to-seize-your-assets_03192014

    http://www.blacklistednews.com/New_Executive_Order%3A_%E2%80%9CObama_Has_Just_Given_Himself_the_Authority_to_Seize_Your_Assets%E2%80%9D/33838/0/0/0/Y/M.html

    SvaraRadera

KOMMENTARER

Kommentera helst angående ämnet i artiklarna.
Juridiskt ansvar gentemot slavägarna (myndigheter) ligger helt hos kommentatorn. Uppenbara olagligheter inom hat och hets samt Bullshit & Trollshit plockas bort.